Because it was sitting in my barn / shop for over 12 years!! //-->Manuscript Status Tables Part 2 - Notes from the JGR-Space Physics We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. However, the final decision may not be only that of an acceptance or a rejection. In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. [CDATA[// >How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and editor decision started nature rejection - bobmarleypeace.com Nature Neuroscience Decision pending means that the decision is pending.They havent decided yet. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. [CDATA[// > Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. b. I regret giving them his address. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Share your stories! Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. Does this mean a rejection letter is about to come? March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. who will be interested in the new results and why. [CDATA[> How did it go for you after this? Production However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal? Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Graduated from ENSAT (national agronomic school of Toulouse) in plant sciences in 2018, I pursued a CIFRE doctorate under contract with SunAgri and INRAE in Avignon between 2019 and 2022. Improve this answer. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. rev2023.3.3.43278. [CDATA[// >The Cambridge Grammar Of The English Language [PDF] [39mcl5ibdiu0] Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. 3 weeks is pretty long for this. We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. Under these circumstances, authors are strongly advised not to resubmit a revised version as it will be declined without further review. Physical Review X - Editorial Policies and Practices We would suggest that you wait for another 2 weeks before writing to the journal for an update. Ford 1997 Washington Cars for sale - SmartMotorGuide.com According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, Awaiting AE recommendation status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AEs decision for acceptance is pending. Yes, its appropriate. Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. n/a. If Nature declines to publish a paper and does not suggest resubmission, authors are strongly advised to submit their paper for publication elsewhere. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. And "wish you the best in your future endeavors" is the rejection letter equivalent of your crush signing "Have a great summer" in your yearbook. One perk, however, is having the choice and control over what I . My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. Share. The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. In [i] we find started associated with past time in [a] but with future time in [b], as indicated by the temporal modifiers yesterday and tomorrow respectively. A decision by the editor in chief is the . I am at the same stage. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. To complicate matters further, editors must base their decisions on evidence that is never completely reliable. Currently working as an Assistant Editor for the Discover Journals under Springer Nature. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed. Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS.